WLFI 18 News sat down with Andrew Miller on October 3, 2011, to discuss the filing of a wrongful death lawsuit in Cass County Superior Court II by the firm. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Mr. Schroder’s two sons, against Mr. Schroder’s alleged murderer, Loren Hamilton Fry. On September 20, 2011 David Schroder, [...]
Latest News
Logansport, IN - October 10, 2011: Starr Austen & Miller LLP, a prominent Indiana law firm, announces the addition of a new associate attorney, Shannon Starr, Esq. Starr will be focusing on class action, truck and construction accident litigation. Mr. Starr, a Logansport native, earned his a JD from the Saint Louis University School of [...]
The family of Dave Schroder has filed a lawsuit against the man accused of killing him. Schroder was a 75-year-old resident of Logansport, Indiana, who was shot twice in the head. Schroder’s two sons, Terry and Robert, and seeking damages including medical, funeral and burial expenses, emotional distress caused to their father and damages for [...]
– Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Hearing to Determine Where Nationwide Class Action Cases Will Be Heard Logansport, IN, September 27, 2011 – Today, Indiana law firm of Starr, Austen & Miller, LLP, along with the other plaintiff’s firms that have filed class action lawsuits against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (“DuPont”), charging that DUPONT’S [...]
Scott Starr of the Indiana law firm of Starr, Austen & Miller, LLP, and Jonathan Selbin of the national plaintiffs’ law firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, announced that a Pennsylvania homeowner and an Indiana golf course company today filed a nationwide class action lawsuit against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (“DuPont”) charging that DUPONT’S herbicide Imprelis is causing widespread death among trees and other non-targeted vegetation across the country.
Shelper Construction Company files a class action against Kohler regarding design flaws.
The gift of estate planning services that Portland, Ind., resident Jeffrey G. Corle and his wife received in 2010 seemed at first like a thoughtful and worthwhile investment in their future. The couple felt that way about the gift until questions about Unauthorized Practice of Law began drawing attention away from what the estate planning package offered and focused on what was not included: adequate lawyer involvement.