FINRA Tackles Senior Financial Exploitation
FINRA Tackles Senior Financial Exploitation
By Marc J. Ross and A.R. John Hitchings, Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP for Law360.com
By the year 2050, the number of U.S. residents 65 and older is projected to more than double — from 41 million to 86 million. Baby boomers, defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as those born between 1946 and 1964, have begun to retire and control about 50 percent of the total investable assets in the U.S. — more than $30 trillion in net household wealth. Equally significant, by some estimates, one in five Americans aged 65 and older has been victimized by financial fraud. As wealth continues to concentrate in America’s elderly population, and the elderly population grows ever larger, broker-dealers are increasingly faced with instances of suspected financial exploitation of seniors.
Hence, it comes as no surprise that protecting elderly clients from financial abuse and exploitation are a priority for primary regulators such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. In 2015, FINRA opened its Securities Helpline for Seniors, which provides elderly investors with a toll-free number to call for assistance from FINRA or raise concerns about issues with brokerage accounts and investments. According to FINRA, the helpline is a success but has also served to magnify the depth of the problem of elder financial exploitation.
On Feb. 9, 2017, after a lengthy comment and review period, FINRA introduced Rule 2165 and amended Rule 4512. Collectively, these rules aim to provide FINRA member firms with new tools to protect senior investors and persons with mental or physical impairments from financial exploitation.
Rule 2165 permits a FINRA member firm that reasonably believes financial exploitation may be occurring to place a temporary hold of up to 15 business days on the disbursement of funds or securities from the account of a “specified adult” customer. A specified adult is defined as either: (a) a person aged 65 or older; or (b) a person, aged 18 or older, who the firm reasonably believes has a mental or physical impairment that renders the individual unable to protect his or her own interests. The rule creates the ability, but not the obligation, to withhold a disbursement of funds or securities where a firm reasonably believes that financial exploitation may be occurring. The hold only applies to suspicious disbursements — not to securities transactions (i.e. simply buying and selling stock within an account).
Importantly, the rule provides a member firm with a safe harbor from FINRA when it exercises discretion in placing temporary holds on disbursements of funds or securities from the accounts of specified adults under these circumstances. Of course, this begs the question of whether a stockbroker is qualified to pass judgment on the mental condition of his or her clients, and brokerage firms are encouraged to provide their frontline employees with training on how to recognize signs of diminished capacity, cognitive decline, financial impairment or financial exploitation.
The rule also requires that a firm’s written supervisory procedures identify the title of each associated person authorized to place, terminate or extend a temporary hold on behalf of the firm. Any such authorized person must serve in a supervisory, compliance or legal capacity for the firm. If a firm places a hold, the rule requires the firm to immediately initiate an internal review of the facts and circumstances that caused the firm to reasonably believe that financial exploitation of the specified adult has occurred, is occurring, has been attempted, or will be attempted. In addition, the firm must provide both an oral or written notification of, and basis for, the hold to all parties authorized to effect transactions in the account no later than two business days after the date that the firm first placed the hold. Absent an extension from a state regulator, agency or court of competent jurisdiction, the temporary hold may only be extended by the firm for an additional 10 business days.
In concert with Rule 2165, FINRA has amended Rule 4512 to require member firms to make a reasonable effort to obtain the name and contact information for a trusted contact person, who must be 18 years or older, upon the opening of a customer’s account. The amended rule defines the trusted contact person as someone who the customer authorized the firm to contact and disclose information about the customer’s account to address possible financial exploitation, to confirm specifics about the customer’s current contact information or health status, or to identify any legal guardian, executor, trustee, or holder of power of attorney.
While the amendment to Rule 4512 does not prohibit a firm from opening or maintaining an account if the customer fails to identify a trusted contact person, the firm must make a reasonable effort to obtain that information. The amended rule is not retroactive, so for accounts in existence prior to the effective date of the amendment, firms are only required to attempt to obtain the information for a trusted contact person when they update an account’s profile.
The Rule 4512 amendment also requires a firm to disclose in writing at the time of the account opening that the firm is authorized to contact the trusted contact person and disclose information about the client’s account to address, among other things, possible financial exploitation. For any account in existence prior to the effective date of the proposed amendment, a firm would need to provide this disclosure when updating the information for the account.
To complicate matters, however, outside of FINRA, reporting requirements for elder financial exploitation vary on a state-by-state basis. For instance, California requires reporting of possible elder financial exploitation immediately or as soon as possible by telephone, followed by a written report within two business days. On the other hand, reporting of suspected financial exploitation of the elderly is voluntary in New York. Perhaps in an effort to move toward uniformity, the North American Securities Administrators Association recently introduced its model act, which has already been adopted by four states (Alabama, Indiana, Louisiana and Vermont). The NASAA’s model act contains a mandatory obligation to report potential financial exploitation when there is a “reasonable belief” that such exploitation may be occurring. Firms are encouraged to prepare a quick-reference list of state agency contacts for any state wherein they do business and identify whether each state has mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements.
While the implementation date for FINRA Rules 2165 and 4512 is Feb. 5, 2018, member firms would be wise to begin updating and upgrading their policies and procedures for handling elderly clients without delay. America’s wealth is not getting any younger.
 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospectus: 2012 Revision, June 2013,http://esa.un.org/unpd/index.htm.
 Val Srinivas and Urval Goradia, The Future of Wealth in the United States, Deloitte Center for Financial Services, Nov. 9, 2015.
 Public Policy Polling for the Investor Protection Trust, http://www.investorprotection.org/ipt-activities/?fa=research.
 Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 15630.
 NASAA Model Legislation Or Regulation To Protect Vulnerable Adults From Financial Exploitation, Adopted Jan. 22, 2016.
The team of investment fraud lawyers at Starr Austen & Miller LLP fights for the protection of investors and handles cases involving securities arbitration misrepresentation, overconcentration, broker fraud, negligence and breach of trust.